News
US Declares ‘Energy Emergency’ Amid Paris Agreement Exit — What’s Next?
Trump has announced that the United States will sever ties with the Paris Agreement for a second time, following his initial withdrawal in 2017.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82984/82984e508c03980aa0d28745a3ca2d5f1a8b3e3a" alt=""
United States: In a move that has reignited global discourse, President Donald Trump proclaimed that the United States would once again sever ties with the Paris Agreement, marking a notable second exit from the accord.
This declaration, following Trump’s initial departure in 2017, underscores a decisive repudiation of collective global climate action. The announcement comes at a time when the world grapples with unprecedented heatwaves and increasingly severe climate-related catastrophes.
A Resurgence of Fossil Fuel Priorities
In tandem with the withdrawal, Trump declared a “national energy emergency,” aimed at revitalizing domestic oil and gas production. The administration plans to escalate drilling operations, dismantle emissions regulations, and curb incentives for electric vehicles, according to Earth.com.
In his inauguration speech, Trump attributed the nation’s economic difficulties to excessive government expenditure and escalating energy costs. He underscored that his administration’s focus would be to prioritize energy supremacy over environmental protocols.
“The crisis of inflation is rooted in unchecked spending and soaring energy prices. For this reason, today I am also declaring a national energy emergency. We will ‘Drill, baby, drill!’” Trump proclaimed.
This move represents a sharp reversal of the Biden administration’s climate policies, particularly the Inflation Reduction Act, which funneled billions into clean energy tax incentives. By undoing vehicle emissions regulations, Trump is also undermining efforts to accelerate the transition to electric cars.
He referred to these regulations as an “electric vehicle mandate,” describing them as an overreach by the government, posing a threat to the automotive sector, as per Earth.com.
⭕ Michael Bloomberg steps in to fund the UN climate body after the U.S. withdraws from the Paris Agreement under Trump. His philanthropy aims to uphold U.S. climate commitments despite federal disengagement. pic.twitter.com/K11TvmUZV8
— thehardnewsdaily (@TheHardNewsD) January 24, 2025
Global Consequences of Trump’s Climate Shift
According to the Paris Agreement’s framework, a nation cannot instantly exit the treaty. A formal withdrawal notice must first be submitted to the United Nations, after which the exit process typically takes about a year. Although this delay exists, climate advocates warn that even the mere announcement of a withdrawal could weaken global efforts to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
This decision sparks concerns that other nations might follow suit. Argentina, under the leadership of libertarian President Javier Milei, has already hinted at “re-evaluating” its commitment to the accord.
Should major emitters like China and India scale back their climate obligations, it could severely undermine global momentum toward emission reductions.
Nevertheless, despite Trump’s decision, climate leaders remain hopeful that the Paris Agreement will persist. Laurence Tubiana, a pivotal architect of the accord, emphasized that global efforts would continue, irrespective of the United States’ involvement.
“The US withdrawing from the Paris Agreement is unfortunate, but multilateral climate action has proven to be resilient and will transcend any individual country’s politics and policies,” Tubiana remarked, according to the reports by Earth.com.
UN Climate Chief Simon Steill echoed this sentiment, noting that the “door remains open” for the United States to rejoin, while UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed confidence that individual US states, cities, and corporations would persist in advancing climate initiatives, despite the federal government’s stance.
Environmentalists’ Alarms
Trump’s pronouncement has been met with approval from the oil and gas sectors, which have long advocated for deregulation and expanded fossil fuel production.
Energy executives view this as a return to what they describe as “American energy dominance,” emphasizing the importance of bolstering domestic energy production while reducing reliance on external sources.
Mike Sommers, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, lauded the decision, offering support for Trump’s policies.
“The US oil and natural gas industry is prepared to collaborate with the new administration to deliver the practical energy solutions Americans voted for,” Sommers affirmed, as per Earth.com.
However, environmental organizations and climate activists have sharply criticized Trump’s stance. Many argue that this decision signifies a setback in the global struggle against climate change and disregards the overwhelming scientific consensus about the dangers of continued fossil fuel consumption.
Athan Manuel, director of the Sierra Club’s land protection program, condemned Trump’s focus on fossil fuel production.
“This declaration proves that Trump remains out of touch with reality,” Manuel stated. He pointed out that the US is already producing more oil and gas than any nation in history, making any further expansion unnecessary and environmentally disastrous.
Alarming Climate Warnings
The decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord comes at a moment when scientific warnings about the climate crisis are growing ever more dire.
In recent years, global temperatures have exceeded the critical 1.5°C warming threshold for the first time—an alarming milestone that scientists have long warned could result in irreversible environmental damage, according to reports by Earth.com.
The United States has already experienced the repercussions of a warming planet. In 2024, Hurricane Helene became the second-deadliest storm to strike the mainland in over half a century, leaving destruction in its wake across multiple states. Wildfires, exacerbated by rising temperatures and prolonged droughts, have ravaged California, with Los Angeles suffering some of the worst devastation in recent memory.
Despite the overwhelming evidence linking fossil fuel consumption to environmental catastrophes, Trump’s administration remains steadfast in its commitment to ramping up oil and gas production.
Critics argue that this policy approach fails to acknowledge the growing economic perils of climate change, including infrastructure damage, disruptions to supply chains, and skyrocketing disaster recovery expenses.
Trump’s Climate Strategy
Although Trump’s policies are likely to decelerate the pace of US emissions reductions, experts maintain that long-term progress on climate issues will persist.
Numerous states and cities have already pledged to ambitious climate targets, and major corporations continue to invest heavily in renewable energy. These localized efforts may help mitigate some of the harm caused by federal policy reversals, according to Earth.com.
Even during Trump’s first term, US emissions decreased in certain regions, propelled by market dynamics and state-driven initiatives. The proliferation of wind and solar energy has continued unabated, driven by falling costs and increasing public demand for clean energy alternatives.
Yet, Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and declare an energy emergency represents a substantial shift in US climate policy.
As noted by Earth.com, this move sets the stage for fierce political battles over the future of environmental regulations and raises important questions about the nation’s role in global climate leadership.
As the effects of climate change accelerate, the world will be closely watching to see whether the United States re-engages with international climate efforts or persists in prioritizing fossil fuel expansion. The stakes have never been higher, and the consequences of inaction are becoming more apparent with each passing day.
News
Trump, Starmer, and Zelenskyy: What Really Happened at the White House?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a156d/a156d1b2acf73097b457cc31b8c9cfd306a320ba" alt="Trump, Starmer, and Zelenskyy: What Really Happened at the White House? | Credits: Reuters"
United States: Amid a swirl of inquiries on Thursday, former President Donald Trump found himself repeatedly questioned about his prior remarks, wherein he branded Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a “dictator.” However, Trump frequently sidestepped the inquiries or seemed unable to recall his contentious statement.
During a meeting at the White House with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the two leaders engaged in discussions centered around brokering peace between Ukraine and Russia. Trump highlighted what he described as back-to-back “highly productive” conversations with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelenskyy, expressing optimism for a swift resolution to the ongoing conflict, according to reports by Fox News.
“I believe we’ve made significant strides, and the pace of progress is quite encouraging,” Trump asserted. “Tomorrow, the momentum toward peace will gain further traction as President Zelenskyy visits the White House. He’ll arrive early in the day, and together, we’ll sign a landmark agreement that positions the United States as a pivotal partner in the development of Ukraine’s valuable minerals, rare earth elements, as well as its oil and gas resources.”
The planned meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy is set for approximately 11 a.m. on Friday. Trump emphasized that the rare earth minerals agreement would lay a robust foundation for a sustainable and mutually beneficial future between the United States and Ukraine.
With Zelenskyy’s visit imminent, journalists pressed Trump on whether he intended to issue an apology for his “dictator” remark. Earlier this month, Trump had sharply criticized Zelenskyy as a “dictator without elections” following Ukraine’s exclusion from the initial US-led peace negotiations with Russia.
🚨🇺🇦 NEW: President Trump calls Volodymyr Zelenskyy a ‘dictator without elections’ and says that he ‘better move fast or he won’t have a country left’ pic.twitter.com/Icom6uPjew
— Politics US (@PolitlcsUS) February 19, 2025
In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared, “A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast, or he is not going to have a Country left. Meanwhile, we are successfully negotiating an end to the War with Russia, something all admit only ‘TRUMP’ and the Trump Administration can do. Biden never tried, Europe has failed to bring Peace, and Zelenskyy probably wants to keep the ‘gravy train’ going,” as per the reports by Fox News.
When reporters revisited the subject as Trump welcomed Starmer, one journalist drew attention to the apparent contradiction between Trump labeling Zelenskyy a dictator and Starmer’s categorization of Putin as a dictator.
Trump deftly dodged the initial question, prompting a follow-up from another reporter, asking if he still stood by his assertion that Zelenskyy was a dictator.
“Did I say that?” Trump responded, appearing perplexed. “I can’t believe I said that. Next question.”
Later, following a private meeting in the Oval Office, Trump and Starmer reappeared before the press. Once again, Trump was asked whether he would seize the opportunity to apologize to Zelenskyy for his remark while simultaneously offering praise to Putin, widely regarded as an autocratic leader.
Rather than directly addressing his “dictator” comment, Trump instead spoke of the impending meeting with Zelenskyy, stating, “I think we’re going to have a very good meeting tomorrow… We’re going to get along really well.”
While the Ukraine-Russia conflict was a focal point of the discussions between Trump and Starmer, trade also emerged as a significant topic. When questioned about potential tariffs on the UK, Trump acknowledged that Starmer had made a strong case against such measures, according to the reports by Fox News.
“I think there’s a very good chance that, in the case of these two great friendly countries, I think we could very well end up with a real trade deal where the tariffs wouldn’t be necessary,” Trump said. “We’ll see.”
'I can't believe I said that.' – Trump denies calling Zelensky a dictator.
— Viory Video (@vioryvideo) February 27, 2025
On 19 February, President Trump called Zelensky a 'dictator without elections,' saying that he should 'move fast' or he won't 'have a country left.' pic.twitter.com/whDKViK2YC
Despite the rocky beginnings of US-UK relations in the colonial era, both leaders emphasized the enduring strength and uniqueness of the modern alliance. As a testament to this special relationship, Starmer presented Trump with a letter from King Charles, extending a formal invitation for a state visit.
“It was my privilege and honor to bring a letter with me today from His Majesty the King, not only sending his best wishes but also inviting the president and the first lady to make a state visit to the United Kingdom, an unprecedented second state visit,” Starmer announced. “It’s so incredible. It will be historic, and I’m delighted that I can go back to His Majesty the King and tell him that President Trump has accepted the invitation.”
Trump, visibly pleased, expressed his gratitude to the prime minister and couldn’t resist a lighthearted comment, according to Fox News.
“What a beautiful accent,” he remarked. “I would have been president 20 years ago if I had that accent.”
News
Oil Prices Soar After This New Surprise Move—What It Means for You
Oil prices rose over 1 percent on Thursday after Trump revoked Chevron’s license to export Venezuelan crude, sparking supply concerns.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09b59/09b598c826609302cfd388d89a45f20c23317d0d" alt="Oil Prices Soar After This New Surprise Move—What It Means for You | Credits: Freepik"
United States: Oil prices surged beyond 1 percent on Thursday as apprehensions over supply constraints reemerged following US President Donald Trump’s abrupt revocation of a crucial license that had permitted US energy behemoth Chevron (CVX.N) to continue its Venezuelan operations.
However, these gains were tempered by mounting optimism regarding a potential diplomatic resolution in Ukraine, which, if materialized, could lead to an uptick in Russian crude exports. Additionally, an unanticipated increase in US gasoline and distillate inventories exerted downward pressure on price momentum, according to reports by Reuters.
As of 1240 GMT, Brent crude futures advanced 86 cents, equivalent to a 1.19 percent rise, reaching USD 73.39 per barrel. Concurrently, US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures climbed 78 cents, or 1.14 percent, to settle at USD 69.40 per barrel. This follows a prior session where both contracts concluded at their lowest valuation since December 10.
“Oil prices are exhibiting signs of stabilization around their two-month troughs after Trump’s decision to rescind Chevron’s license, effectively barring the company from exporting Venezuelan crude,” noted PVM analyst Tamas Varga.
The revocation of Chevron’s license signifies the company’s forfeiture of its ability to ship Venezuelan crude to international markets. Consequently, if Venezuela’s state-run oil entity PDVSA assumes control over these exports, US refineries will find themselves unable to procure the crude due to stringent American sanctions, as per Reuters.
“Chevron’s withdrawal from the Venezuelan oil landscape could curtail the nation’s overall crude production, potentially affording OPEC+ additional leeway to amplify output,” analysts at TD Cowen observed in a research note. “Should this materialize, coastal refiners in the US might face escalated procurement expenses.”
In the event that OPEC+ refrains from augmenting supply, the market could witness a pronounced elevation in heavy sour crude prices, a development that would disproportionately impact US refiners reliant on such blends.
Chevron currently exports approximately 240,000 barrels per day (bpd) from its Venezuelan operations, a figure constituting over a quarter of the country’s total oil production.
According to the reports, Trump’s overtures toward brokering a Russia-Ukraine peace accord have garnered significant scrutiny. The former president disclosed that Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskiy is scheduled to visit Washington on Friday to finalize an accord concerning rare earth minerals. However, Zelenskiy underscored that the outcome of negotiations hinges on continued US assistance.
“Financial markets thrive on clarity and abhor uncertainty. Absent a definitive trajectory on trade tariffs and Eastern European stability, oil prices are likely to oscillate unpredictably, with sporadic, sentiment-driven surges,” Varga added.
Separately, data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) on Wednesday revealed an unexpected contraction in domestic crude inventories spurred by heightened refining activity. However, contrary to forecasts, gasoline and distillate stockpiles registered unanticipated gains, adding an additional layer of complexity to market dynamics.
News
Why Is Elon Musk Shaping Trump’s Cabinet? The Answer May Surprise You!
White House press secretary explained why Musk would attend Trump’s inaugural Cabinet meeting despite not being a Cabinet member.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5596c/5596c012138c10781b8654813cda405259cad139" alt="Why Is Elon Musk Shaping Trump’s Cabinet? The Answer May Surprise You!"
United States: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday elucidated to reporters why Elon Musk is slated to join President Trump’s inaugural Cabinet meeting, despite his non-Cabinet status, offering a glimpse into the forthcoming assembly.
“Elon collaborates daily with Cabinet secretaries and their teams to unearth inefficiency, malfeasance, and exploitation within these agencies,” Leavitt articulated when probed about Musk’s participation. “Every Cabinet secretary heeds the guidance and strategic direction of DOGE,” she affirmed.
Leavitt further underscored the symbiotic relationship between the secretaries and DOGE, shedding light on the meeting’s objectives, according to the reports by CNN.
“Cabinet members will be presenting updates on their progress,” she conveyed, “and sharing insights into the initiatives underway within their agencies, particularly in relation to advancing the policy commitments the president championed during his campaign.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48e11/48e1102c755636c13dfd0593c00f0d349d64e487" alt="Why Is Elon Musk Shaping Trump’s Cabinet? The Answer May Surprise You!"
House Speaker Seeks Minimal Adjustments to Budget Resolution Ahead of Senate Discussions
According to the reports by CNN, House Speaker Mike Johnson disclosed plans to convene with Senate Majority Leader John Thune on Wednesday, following the House’s narrow approval of its budget framework on Tuesday evening.
When questioned about his openness to alterations in the final budget resolution, Johnson told CNN, “As few changes as feasible.”
The House’s adoption of the extensive budget outline came after Johnson’s determined efforts to sway resistant members. With a last-minute push from President Donald Trump via phone calls, GOP leaders engaged in a whirlwind of persuasion throughout Tuesday to galvanize support for their proposal.
-
land-warfare5 months ago
THEON and EXOSENS announce the signing of a longer-term commercial agreement
-
land-warfare5 months ago
Allen-Vanguard receives significant follow-on order of SCORPION ECM Systems for a NATO ally
-
News3 months ago
The Dark Side of a Vaccine Trial: What AstraZeneca Doesn’t Want You to Know
-
defense decisions5 months ago
Strategy is About Solving Core Problems: Not Asserting Lofty Principles
-
land-warfare5 months ago
Australian Forces Field DAGOR All-Terrain Vehicles
-
defense decisions5 months ago
Deterrence and Defence Manufacturing: Australia Faces a Major Challenge
-
land-warfare5 months ago
September Radio Roundup – Armada International
-
defense decisions5 months ago
Is Australia Ready for Conflict in an Age of Empires?